JD Next Practice Exam

What is the general outcome when a promise in exchange for an event that depends on the discretion of one party is made?

1. The promise is legally binding

2. The promise is unenforceable due to vagueness

3. The promise creates an obligation for both parties

4. The promise must be documented in writing

The correct answer is: The promise is unenforceable due to vagueness

When a promise is made in exchange for an event that depends on one party's discretion, it generally results in challenges regarding enforceability because the terms may be considered too vague. This vagueness can prevent the promise from being legally binding. A promise needs to have clear, concrete terms for it to be enforceable in a court of law; if the event is entirely at the discretion of one party, it risks lacking the necessary specificity. For example, if one party promises to deliver a service contingent on their subjective assessment of the need for that service, this can create ambiguity. The lack of a defined action or measurable outcome means that it would be difficult for a court to enforce the promise if required. Thus, the promise would be deemed unenforceable due to vagueness, as it fails to create a clear, mutual obligation. This context clarifies why the outcome is that the promise is unenforceable, without supporting obligations for both parties or a requirement for written documentation.